Rangers Rumours Mobile


Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

21 Jul 2017 10:20:57
I'm hearing Pedro Caixinha's contract will be terminated if we're not in the Top 2 competing with Celtic. Board is not happy after crashing out of Europe and Jonatan Johansson or Helder Baptisa will become interim till a new manager is found after new year.

Believable10 Unbelievable41

21 Jul 2017 10:44:23
Anyone could tell you if he's not in the top 2 he'll be sacked haha

Agree17 Disagree4

21 Jul 2017 11:36:17
Is that the voices in your head Andy?

Agree14 Disagree5

21 Jul 2017 12:35:38
I hope the "voices" are right ;) . Pedro must be the least promising manager in the Scottish Premiership.

Agree8 Disagree23

21 Jul 2017 13:48:19
Not being funny or arrogant andy cargill but how do you know this would be the case? That without doubt would be kept in house and only circulated around a chosen few!

Agree19 Disagree3

21 Jul 2017 14:18:23
I can't believe that people who consider themselves rangers fans want our manager to fail.

Agree14 Disagree2

21 Jul 2017 14:18:37
Ok so they would sack him but somehow his assistant who has followed him everywhere would stay and be interim?

Agree14 Disagree2

21 Jul 2017 14:49:07
Ped has brought in higher calibre of players most of which were not involved in the European match, Alves speaks highly of him and his desire to win and the good feeling in the training room and let's be honest he knows a hell of a lot more than us let's give him a chance warbs got sacked for not keeping us in second and competing for the title so it is obvious if Ped can't so will he

Agree14 Disagree4

21 Jul 2017 14:56:03
I hope the "voices" are wrong Andy as that would mean we had made no improvement! Yea jury's still out on manager but I hope he does well like a true ranger I crave success for our team

Agree12 Disagree2

21 Jul 2017 18:20:48
His only competitive games so far have been with a team that's not his own. Even the team knocked out of the Europa had only a couple of new boys with zero previous minutes for Rangers. People need to relax. Rome wasnt built in a day and all that! i'd give him til Xmas at least and even then sacking him just means another reset. As long as we stop 10 in a row i don't care if it takes us 2 more years of hard churn. it was always going to be a long road. Show some loyalty and back him instead of listening to every rumour and criticising at every opportunity.

Agree8 Disagree1

21 Jul 2017 22:11:31
It's been a shocking start to the season but ANDY give the manager and team a chance.
I agree with Blueger Rome wasn't built in a day so patience is needed by all supporters, but time will tell if Caixinha was the right appointment by the board.

Agree3 Disagree0

21 Jul 2017 22:21:17
Hopefully manager is here for next four or five seasons as that means success on the park. Can't keep starting again. Always going to be issues in changing room until the waste is shipped out.

Agree4 Disagree0

22 Jul 2017 00:36:12
I think we all understand this is a rumour site, however Andy clearly isn't spreading an even (itsy bitsy teenie weenie) remotely tangible 'rumour'. Dave King would not have that sort of conversation with anyone at this stage. (Just bought 10 players who are yet untested) not to mention how much it would undermine Pedro. However above ALL that, why would DK tell this info to some 2 bob rocket (or his friend) that runs to a rumour site to spill the beans, when if it did leak he would know exactly who done it. In other words Andy, you are a royal Walter Mitty! Get a real hobby mate

Agree1 Disagree0

20 Jul 2017 21:52:10
Apparently we're in talks with free agent Ryan Tunnicliffe along with Barnsley and PNE

Believable12 Unbelievable5

20 Jul 2017 22:15:58
I honestly think we have enough midfielders, his contract was not renewed by Fulham after spells on loan to Wigan and Blackburn, don't think he is what we need.

Agree17 Disagree3

21 Jul 2017 11:40:39
Looked at his profile. Has a good pedigree but may have a few issues with his behaviour. Let's see what happens.

Agree3 Disagree1

20 Jul 2017 15:40:12
Anyone know anything of us playing Watford in a previous season friendly!?

Believable4 Unbelievable24

20 Jul 2017 18:17:31
can the person who ticked unbelievable confirm how he knows we are not playing them

Agree1 Disagree19

20 Jul 2017 19:06:47
Just realised I wrote previous! Meant pre season

Agree0 Disagree16

20 Jul 2017 21:04:53
Can truebluesotrue relax, as by stating 'unbelievable' doesn't mean that it's stating it's not fact, just not very believable at this stage - hence rumour site 😉

Agree8 Disagree15

20 Jul 2017 21:12:30
"can the person who ticked unbelievable confirm how he knows we are not playing them"

Laughed at this a bit too much

Agree8 Disagree11

21 Jul 2017 14:34:37
It said in the Scottish sun that rangers had organised friendlies with st Johnstone Marseille and Watford at Vicarage Road and would take place 25/ 26 July. Not sure if that has been changed to shef wed but it was reported we would play Watford

Agree0 Disagree1

19 Jul 2017 23:33:34
Reports that Warbs is weighing up a move to take Foderingham to Notts Forrest

Believable12 Unbelievable8

20 Jul 2017 02:17:48
I said a few days ago we should get Zander Clark from St Johnstone. Just been handed a year deal but St Johnstone would be easy to deal with.

A future Scotland International.

Agree5 Disagree16

20 Jul 2017 06:24:15
As are Liam Kelly/ Robbie mcCrorie. I believe Alnwick is a better all round keeper than Fods and would easily make the step up. Liam Kelly should be second choice

Agree15 Disagree10

20 Jul 2017 07:02:55
Although I think fods is a brilliant keeper and would love to keep him, if we get a bid of 3 to 4 million we would be better re investing it in the squad on another key player. Someone of the caliber of Davis and ferguson when he came back in the middle of the park or a 30 goal a season striker

Agree8 Disagree12

20 Jul 2017 07:42:00
3-4 million for Fod are you insane.

heres what's what- teams know we ain't flush flush, look at Barry leaving for chips.

fod will go for less than 1.5 million if we are lucky

why would we get 3-4 for him, we finished 3rd last year and he didn't keep us in europe?

you can't just say Foster went for 9 million and Fod is half as good so we will get 4 million.

Anyway i do rate him and don't want him to go, the dross infront of him don't help, this is a new season let's see how he does with Alves infront of him

Agree9 Disagree5

20 Jul 2017 07:54:03
Greyfrair, totally agree with zander Clark great presence and would in my opinion be better than we have right now. Cardiff blue wes is no way brilliant as he is a poor communicator and does not command his area like a brilliant keeper should, has a tendency to create pandemonium amongst our defence. can make the odd decent save though

Agree10 Disagree5

20 Jul 2017 08:44:06
Punt Fodderingham in a heart beat. I'd say possibly £750k to £1m going by the market down south and any more would be a bonus. Line up McGreggor for a return. We can still get 3 years or so out of him and he's proven to be more than what's required for the league. A bit of certainty wouldn't hurt in this department and pelter would give us that and more plus no 'Settling in period'.

Agree13 Disagree8

20 Jul 2017 09:38:02
Clubs won't think we are flush yet we have just spent over 7m. I think its more a case of selling players who will not feature at whatever clubs will pay just to get them off the wage bill eg crooks.

Barry was in last year and probably was not going to be a main player this year. Plus he probably wanted to play for warbs as he played his best football for him, at least we didn't stand in his way.

For players like Wes I'd think we will be looking for a certain value or won't sell.

Agree7 Disagree4

20 Jul 2017 10:20:41
Going by our clubs transfer dealings wes will be sold sumwer between 500k to 800k

Agree7 Disagree4

20 Jul 2017 10:33:34
Would bite your hand off for a 1M offer for Fod. Tho reckon it will be nearer 700k. Alnwick would step in comfortably and don't think we need another keeper in. Cash would go on Walker or Naismith (rumour just won't go away and he wants to come home similar to Dorrans) .

Agree10 Disagree6

20 Jul 2017 11:26:45
Alnwick is better than foderingham?

Agree6 Disagree8

20 Jul 2017 12:49:16
Mate he's not Gers quality-if we ever want to get back to saying that. If we don't aspire then we may as well pack up our case.

A keeper is going to need to be on the money straight away though, which is why I say bring back McGreggor.

Agree7 Disagree7

20 Jul 2017 14:53:54
All depends on how much their offering and if Ped thinks Ailnwick can step up or has an Keeper lined up fir a decent Transfer Fee. Could see Warbs putting in a late bid just to mess with us so having a Keeper basically just waiting to sign the Contract, having terms etc all sorted out just in case.

Agree4 Disagree0

20 Jul 2017 14:55:19
Swap MOH for Zander Clark plus cash job done

Agree4 Disagree4

20 Jul 2017 16:33:52
Foderingham, like most of the team last year - is a bombscare. thinks he can play football. I've actually mnever seen him kick a ball out from his area to a team mate. and his distribution under pressure is shocking. no footwork.

Agree6 Disagree5

20 Jul 2017 18:10:57
Gods is a decent shot stopper but can't even command the 6 yard box he has no presence Goram and Klos were small for keepers but they had a presence and commanded their area McGregor would be a good replacement and give Kelly and McCrorie a couple o years to develop

Agree5 Disagree3

20 Jul 2017 19:22:55
I Never said we would get 3 4 million for him, that's what I think our price would be. For team continuity you can't get red of an entire team of 15 and replace and them expect to gel, we need to keep the few that had pass marks. I. e fods miller, Wallace, krancjar before the injury, beer man and tav (if you asked me after a few pints)

Agree2 Disagree2

20 Jul 2017 19:39:19
i would take mcgregor back in a minuet if he was a free or very very cheap but wuldnt blow my cash on him plus fod was let down by the worst defence I've seen rangers have and that includes our captain waldo who for me lost all of his motivation last year and is soo one sided its unreal.

for me i'd like to see fod given another year with a good defence infront of him but we need a rw and walker ticks all the boxes plays in this league so next to no settling in period and can score aswell as create and i'd like to see a striker that we look at and just know he is gonny score goals this for me now that we have a midfield that fighting for places and a defence that's almost complete is essential marelos looks good but quite small and could get bullied in this league so a big guy with a good head on him is what i'd look for

Agree4 Disagree1

20 Jul 2017 19:54:17

Doubt very much St Johnstone can afford MOH wages otherwise I'm sure he would have signed for them already

Agree7 Disagree1

20 Jul 2017 21:24:48
Decent keepers are like golddust and if I remember correctly the bread man by starterd off by saying he was a future England goalkeeper!
5 mill no less!

Onward and upward

Agree6 Disagree2

21 Jul 2017 07:23:27
As i said last season. Fods is the worst rangers keeper I have ever seen. I'll drive him to Nottingham. You lot are deluded thinking he is gers class. Think of who we have had? Klos, Goram, Woods, Walker, Dibble and Macgregor. Then we now have Fods. Ever noticed when he let's onein he gives it 9.9 for the cameras! Guys a Dud.

Agree2 Disagree1

21 Jul 2017 08:42:31
We have a history of good goalkeepers, and even our reserve gks were good. allymaxwell bonnie Ginsberg etc . I don't rate wes foderingham as high as previous reserve keepers as he has no presence cannot command area, and communication skills are zilch. I thought ped would have started rebuilding with a new keeper. wish we kept gills over wes

Agree6 Disagree1

21 Jul 2017 10:13:37
If Warburton keeps buying his rangers players then get your money on Nottingham to get relegated this season

Agree3 Disagree1

21 Jul 2017 13:22:54

Your dreaming if you think he would go for £5m we will be doing well getting £1m for him very average keeper

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Jul 2017 17:48:03
Need to play Alnwick in the friendly against Marseille and then we might know if Fod can be transferred that's providing Caixinha wants to sell him.
Notts Forest have just banked 15 million.
If Warbs wants him then he needs to offer a decent fee.
Is that fee 1 million plus a sell on clause?

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2017 17:54:31

MOH on loan to St Johnstone and Zander Clark on loan to Rangers with an option to buy for both clubs at the end of the season, or in the January transfer window.

Agree1 Disagree1

21 Jul 2017 20:21:52
Dibble. walker. ginzburg. ally maxwell? Are you guys having a giraffe. Fods is the biggest asset we have. he's the only player who could actually hold his head high last season during the nightmare. he's better than Zander Clark. and Alnwicks a good back up. but not in Fods league. Reminds me of the Souness Revolution this. Anyone left over from previous regime being hounded out door. players like Coisty Coops and Stuart Munro looked set for the exit. but ended up playing a big part in our success. Now its happening again. if you're one of Warbs boys, then your time is up at Ibrox.

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Jul 2017 23:09:18
Sun reporting the loaf wants to take wes foderingham to Forrest! Hope he wants keirnan and Forrester too! Would raise funds for Walker maybe full back!

Believable4 Unbelievable5

19 Jul 2017 23:48:49
Bgate I honestly don't think we need to raise funds, it's just that we are not prepared to pay an extra 40-50% of our original bid.
We should stick to our bid of 500k I don't even want us to go to 600k. Why pay 1m for a Player when come near the end of the Transfer Window i'm sure Hearts WILL do business with us as I do not think Budge will let 500k dissappear and keep an unhappy player at the Club for him to sign a pre-contract in Jan OR try to sell in Jan for prob less than 500k. They need the cash and just because we could afford 1m does not mean we pay it. Big difference in fee for only waiting weeks, cash saved can be used for either another Transfer or wages for a loan.

Agree9 Disagree7

20 Jul 2017 07:40:37
Can anyone clear this up. Just want to know for sure what the compensation rules are for players under 24.

I posted the other day that Hearts would be entitled to £400,000 development fee if walker leaves next summer as when his contract expires on the 1st June 2018 he will still be only be 24. As far as I'm aware clubs are entitled to a fee for players 24 years old and under and a few mates of mine who are Jambos believe this is also the case. If this is true then i can see why Hearts are hanging on to him as there is no point selling for the £600,000 we have offered if they are guaranteed this fee anyway. I'd love to see Walker at Ibrox but if this is the case then it makes our bid look ridiculous.

Agree2 Disagree4

20 Jul 2017 13:07:21
Its under 23 that rule applies

Agree2 Disagree2

20 Jul 2017 19:44:35
rule is for under 24 not including as far as i'm aware and if u think we will get him next season your aff your head sum1 from england will offer him massive wages compared to what we offer him and he will be another one that we let go
i personally would pay what they are asking for but that's because i believe in two seasons time we could easily get 4-5 million for him if he players well and that is still good business ad i know you don't want to give hearts money but they would rather keep a player that will score goals and set up goals than have 500,000 and i'd rather have a player that does those things rather than wait and not have that player for the start of this new season

Agree2 Disagree0

20 Jul 2017 22:18:22
would give the 600k offered with some milestone add ons say 20+goals first season 100k thoughts?

Agree0 Disagree1

21 Jul 2017 04:31:03
glad to see your following me as blueblood1, happy to have an impact.

mon the gers.

stick together and great things can happen

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2017 14:12:56
Can anyone tell me if the buying Club can rip up a Pre-Contract a Player signs 6 months before his Contract is actually up?

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Jul 2017 15:14:18
Seen Ibrox Noise reporting interest in Jamie Murphy, anyone any clue where that's came from as it's the first i've heard of it. Also, thoughts if it's true?

Believable2 Unbelievable18

19 Jul 2017 16:32:50
Cracking player would be a great signing but really can't see him being available

Agree5 Disagree6

19 Jul 2017 16:39:19
SSN mentioned it couple of days ago us the rotten mob and a couple of championship teams in for him £4M transfer fee was mentioned think its a non starter tbh

Agree7 Disagree4

19 Jul 2017 17:37:26
Murphy at 4m seems to much imo! If we did have that sort of money left for Transfers especially after bringing in Walker I would be very surprised.
Now that Europe is gone any Transfers do not need to be concluded as quickly as we first thought.
I want to know peoples honest opinion. Not on how much Walker is worth BUT do we think that Budge will really let 500-600k slip through the Clubs fingers? IMO getting Walker Today for 1m or waiting 2-3 weeks and getting him for 40-50% cheaper plus the lad isn't sitting on his ass he'll be 100% match fit when he arrives.
Be interesting to see what kind of business Hearts do over the next 2 weeks? If they do ANY business the chances of us getting Walker for 5-600k looks good.
Opinions. Will Hearts knock back our original bid?
Could and should we go no higher than 500k.
Could we loan them O'halloran with Hearts paying the majority of Wages! Say they pay 65% of a 7k a week Player which is what I've heard he's on! SO that's around £210k, leaving us with around £130k! Don't know if Hearts would/ could or want to meet that? But we could adjust figure for Walker to suit.
Anyways I truly believe that the table will turn and Hearts will come back to table and accept 500k and we SHOULD play the waiting game. Who not only agrees but thinks that we could end up holding the cards over this deal as it could come down to 500k OR LESS :) or absolutely F#@K ALL! for those greedy Tarts.

Agree4 Disagree9

19 Jul 2017 18:02:33
Brighton have just been promoted to the EPL. can't see it to be honest guys . done well down there he won't be in a hurry to leave

Agree5 Disagree3

19 Jul 2017 21:20:59
Murphy would do a job for us but if we are unable to match Hearts transfer fee for Walker there is no chance of us getting Murphy- but he would be a quality addition.
A less expensive option would be Cadden from Motherwell and also Walker.

Agree1 Disagree3

19 Jul 2017 22:57:59
I don't really think it's that we 'can't' match Walkers fee. Its that we shouldn't be paying 1m for a Hearts player within a year of finishing his current contract. McKay left for half a milllion. Walker isn't worth much more than that with a year left.

Agree4 Disagree3

20 Jul 2017 14:26:21
Well it could be a great signing but do u think Pedro is now doubting the chance to get 3 more in as the kb just keeps happening.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2017 00:57:51
Mika from Sunderland would replace him

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2017 04:31:34
Muprhy is cracking, very consistent always running and can deliver a cross

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2017 13:23:49

What makes you think Hearts would automatically want MOH?

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Jul 2017 14:27:18
Remember reading something about the possibility of O'halloran going to Hearts amidst the whole saga of us trying to get Walker and its stuck. I suppose I am just desperate to see Walker arrive AND offload some Players.

Agree2 Disagree0

19 Jul 2017 09:00:02
Reports saying crooks signed for NTFC for £125k. Surely we should have wanted more for him as we got him for a nominal fee out of contract. I hope widnass commands at least £500k. I am sure if it was them coming to us from these clubs the fees would be far greater than the reverse

Believable6 Unbelievable10

19 Jul 2017 10:42:48
£125k for a players we paid half that for who hasn't played a game for us is pretty good going. Recovers his wages and initial fee.

Agree7 Disagree3

19 Jul 2017 11:18:17
He was out of contract Stuart. That's why he was so cheap.

Agree1 Disagree9

19 Jul 2017 14:08:12
If we let Crooks go for £125k whoever is running and agreeing fees should be locked up. His market value was at least £250k plus a sell on clause.

Agree3 Disagree4

19 Jul 2017 14:34:33
£125K is not bad business.

Firstly why would anyone pay more. WE are not going to play him and everyone knows this. We are selling a load of players. Why would they offer more. what's the alternative. Keep him and never play him? Nonsense.

Secondly he was bought for less. He's been injured for most of his time with us and he has done nothing to increase his value with us.

There is no alternative!

Agree9 Disagree2

19 Jul 2017 15:30:59
Think that whatever we think a Player's value is even after taking everything into consideration at our Club we will get shafted big time on any/ all Transfer Fee's. I and prob most think that we could possibly get 400-500k for Windass when in fact we'll prob get something between 250-350k.
Thinking that Players like Dodoo O'halloran would be best to loan out rather than take a 60-70% hit on the Fee we paid for them. Both Players imo could kick on given a chance but they won't get that at Ibrox especially Dodoo due to Signings brought in, in his position although Pedro may be looking at BOTH as Wingers? As when I look at the Sqaud we only have 2 Wingers in Dalcio + Candieas. After Forester goes we are very lean in those areas, Wags has played there but I hope Pedro doesn't do that and he's off again we'll prob not get 4-500k prob 2-300k. As with Dodoo, he played the Wing but imo best to offload and insteas of accepting 125-200k loan him and he as with O'halloran could do really well and get the Club we loan him too AND Teams in that particular League? Anyways if all go Wags Dodoo Forester and O'halloran, Loaned or not then it does leave us with only TWO Wingers or I'm I wrong?

Agree11 Disagree1

19 Jul 2017 19:35:16
FFS, even forest gump would realise that a players value is what someone is prepared to pay!

Jeez I do wonder about some of our fans on here!

Agree3 Disagree4

19 Jul 2017 19:45:59
Fd what do you mean his market value is £250k? We paid a small fee for him and Windass. Crooks hasn't played for us all season and is obviously not in the managers plans. We want him off the wage bill so £150k recoups what we paid for him and his wages (or there abouts) .

In regards to Windass if we get £500k for him I'll be shocked. The guy is so far out of his depth here. Yes he's a powerful runner etc but can anyone honestly say they see him playing at a decent standard in say 2 or 3 years time? By decent standard I mean mid table English championship level or above? I go home and away to watch rangers and I can't see it.

In regards to Forrester, Waghorn, Kiernan, MOH etc. If we were offered anywhere near £250k for each we should bite their hand off. If not they will sit in the stands and take a wage for nothing.

Agree4 Disagree0

20 Jul 2017 14:17:28
just need to get the numbers down as we can't afford it right now.

we need to free money up to buy walker and if we miss out on him i think we will have missed a trick. if the only way we get him is for 1 mill then i'd pay that as when he is a free agent english championship teams will pay treble the wages we would offer and that will be that but if we sign him and he does well then we could command a good fee for the lad still good business if u ask me

Agree1 Disagree1

18 Jul 2017 23:11:13
Keep hearing rumours about players saying they don't rate the new guys. Fair enough they may well have said this but I'm almost 100% sure a couple of Mexican internationals (one of which hasn't actually played yet), a 90 odd capped Portuguese international, a Scotland international and a highly rated young Portuguese centre half are all better than the likes of Kiernan, ohalloran, Forrester etc.

Teams don't gel over night these things take time. The new players need to get used to a new country, different styles and different culture. let's give them time to settle before we judge.

It hasn't been an ideal start but I'm not worried about losing closed doors friendlies, we've had seasons in the past where we've had awful pre seasons and won the league. I don't think we will win the league but I think we need to be patient. let's see where we are at the end of August then we can start to judge until then we need to get behind the manager and his new players.

Believable11 Unbelievable11

19 Jul 2017 00:05:30
I think what's happening is people r judging the manager very quickly and mayb not the players.

Agree10 Disagree6

19 Jul 2017 00:07:55
Yeah your right teams don't gel overnight but come on, losing to parttimers then getting beat off a second string st Johnstone team with most of our new players involved. The writing is on the wall, anyone who says Pedro should be given a chance is in denial, he is a disaster and all the rumours about unrest and players confronting the manager is beginning to gather pace and with the new season just around the corner i for one hope the board have the balls to sack this guy and bring in a proper manager before it's too late. Unfortunately this board are weak and will stick by this guy until the results will inevitably leave them with no choice but to show him the door. I'm all for giving managers a chance but for goodness sake the job is clearly too big for Pedro!

Agree11 Disagree11

19 Jul 2017 06:04:30
It is with regret that I say that I agree with everything you said RonnieR9

Agree8 Disagree5

19 Jul 2017 07:34:21
There's been a campaign against Pedro since he walked through the door by the media and it seems a lot of rangers fans are buying into it as well. Results over pre season have been shocking but then it hasn't been a proper pre season as they weren't counting on shocking Euro result. I think the fact many of the new signings can't speak English isn't helping. I've heard the rumours about previous players (kenny miller) specifically saying the new players are rubbish but it always comes from a friend of a friend who supposedly knows a player. Left and right back concern me but I think we should see how things go first few league games before jumping on the bandwagon.

Agree16 Disagree5

19 Jul 2017 10:09:22
Agree 100% got to give Pedro and players time I really think it will but all the negative stuff especially from the media won't help they want us to fail I know Europe was hard to take what about the other Scottish teams just as bad and Celtic still have a lot to do for champions league group stages

Agree3 Disagree4

19 Jul 2017 10:22:16
Enough of the conspiracy theories. Show me the evidence of a campaign against Pedro. In my eyes, any bad press Pedro has had has been of his own making with his idiotic statements and results.

Agree5 Disagree1

19 Jul 2017 10:40:44
The simple truth of the matter is not one thing has changed in his time as manager except some good sound bites and a few signs up and around the training ground.

The new players, from the limited time we saw them, weren't very impressive - but most players need time. What worries me is his "tactics" and "style".

Setting out that last Europa game with both Rossiter and Jack is mind blazingly negative. Persistent mentioning of high press, quick play, crosses from wide and so on are all well and good, but its not showing on the park - Aberdeen have been weakened this summer of that there is no doubt, yet I would still fancy them to finish above us this year, and when you factor in the amount of money invested in the squad, it is a shambles.
Pedro can only take so much blame, you then must start to look toward the board that appointed a man with no real pedigree and a questionable track record at best.

Only time will tell, but I would think from our first 5 games, anything less than 11 points and he has to be replaced.

Agree2 Disagree3

19 Jul 2017 11:15:48
With Aberdeen signing Stewart, mackay Stevens and christie I would say they have at least stayed on par with last season.

Agree8 Disagree0

19 Jul 2017 11:18:19
I have to admit my concern is the lack of tactics not so much the signings. I personally am not a fan of 433 or 451 whatever you want to call it. I think a 442 diamond would suit us. Jack, Pena, Dorrans and Kranjcar in middle with 2 strikers up front. Playing with 2 strikers is a must for me in most games, especially Ibrox

Agree3 Disagree3

19 Jul 2017 15:39:05
did they not sign sean malloney aswell? half decent player

Agree2 Disagree0

19 Jul 2017 16:26:58
Jyf is spot on. He has faced negative press amongst some Rangers fans from the beginning. Same type of fans who want a "Rangers man" in.

Neiderkorn was just the car crash most of these numpties were begging for so they can install another "Rangers man".

Agree5 Disagree1

19 Jul 2017 19:29:02
Pedro a disaster . not taken in by media. judging him by watching team and results since his arrival . not one good performance from any of his foreign signing as I have stated before Derek mcinness should have been boards first signing and I am sure with millions Pedro has been wasted mcinness would have built a good team to challenge the tims

Agree1 Disagree3

19 Jul 2017 20:43:59
Definitely not a fan of the 4-3-3 formation. Imo I think we should start near enough all games 4-1-4-1 then switch accordingly. Our opening results are massive and we will need to build confidence and not go into games thinking we've already won!
We have on paper a harder start than last Season, Motherwell away is tricky and I don't care what the final score is as long as we win the thing.
Thoughts. What formation do u think Ped will go with at Fir Park and who?
My Team in a 4-1-4-1.
Alves (C)
Regarding who plays up front it prob comes down to showing to be on form during the remaining friendlys.

Agree2 Disagree0

20 Jul 2017 14:19:29
ronnie, guys like u that put all the negativity out there do nothing other than harm our team and make us sound like greeting faced wains.
yes we have lost a couple of games but that doesn't mean this team won't click.
and to be honest i don't think we will win this league for the next few years realistically but i'm not going to say these players are terrible and the manager is worse just because they haven't clicked yet that's just childish.

Agree0 Disagree1

20 Jul 2017 14:23:04
Would someone please tell Pedro what colours gers play I'm his quote after st Johnstone game was he not worried as team was producing and playing well man not up to it

Agree0 Disagree2

18 Jul 2017 19:12:23
I'm reading that wiess wants a return to rangers well I say sign him up immediately I'm sure DK could muster up 2.7M spending over 10M is hardly breaking world records and get in walker again 1M isn't a huge sum of money . this way DK if you want to atleast challenge Celtic you must be willing to spend decent sums of cash without being reckless obviously I believe these 2 players are manageable to get in the door .

Believable3 Unbelievable17

18 Jul 2017 21:44:43
Sick of hearing about Weiss, we have got to live within our means, if that means finishing second this season so be it.

We have already spent a lot of money, on transfer fees or wages
We have to back the manager and stop all the whinging negative comments

Agree12 Disagree6

18 Jul 2017 22:49:32
Would like Weiss back but I remember him being very hit or miss when he played so wouldn't break the bank to get him.

Agree10 Disagree4

18 Jul 2017 23:05:38
Mjg ok I see your point I guess 3rd or 4th place league finish is good enough these days

Agree2 Disagree8

19 Jul 2017 09:37:42
Forget Weiss sign Walker now.
Walker will score goals and add a bit pace and creativity.

Agree9 Disagree0

19 Jul 2017 13:46:51
Some folk are just stuck in the past - let's move on from Weiss, we can't afford him and we've just bought loads of midfielders.

Agree2 Disagree0

19 Jul 2017 22:29:34
Weiss is a far better player now than he was before. And yeah Walker would be my priority and a fee of 5-600k for him is, what we should pay and no more. Hearts will not let that amount pass them by.
But get Weiss too and that gives us 4 Wingers with Dalcio and Candieas. If we have the Transfer Fee I think Weiss will accept the wages we can afford.

Agree4 Disagree0

18 Jul 2017 19:30:40
A share holder at work was telling me we are definitely making a move for naismith and that hibs want windass. Just thought I would share.

Believable5 Unbelievable20

18 Jul 2017 21:56:48
Rotherham want windass

Agree3 Disagree5

19 Jul 2017 19:10:55
being a shareholder gets you no info at all unless you have 7%+ and maybe not even then

Agree3 Disagree0

20 Jul 2017 14:55:51
Doesn't matter if Hibs want Windass they can't afford him. Not unless its a Player plus cash deal but I cannot see us doing business with the Club.

Agree2 Disagree0

Rangers Rumours 2

Rangers Rumours 3

Rangers Rumours Archives

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass  

Warning: include(contact/pop-posts-widget.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /homepages/0/d613650142/htdocs/rangers rumours/mobile/includes/x_footer.php on line 10

Warning: include(): Failed opening 'contact/pop-posts-widget.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php5.6') in /homepages/0/d613650142/htdocs/rangers rumours/mobile/includes/x_footer.php on line 10