03 Feb 2017 22:52:51
Sorry to say bears but warburton will make one change tomorrow at a push. two he's too stubborn to change can still see halliday kiernan starting tomorrow and tav he's kept it that way all season.


1.) 03 Feb 2017
03 Feb 2017 23:01:16
To play Devil's advocate what happens if he makes wholesale changes to the areas we all want after the Hearts game and we get destroyed again? That then cannot be Warbs fault but we will all blame him.

I could care less what team gets put out as long as they show passion to bounce back after the Hearts game!


2.) 03 Feb 2017
03 Feb 2017 23:04:32
If he only makes one change he willl deserve all the abuse that will come his way.


3.) 04 Feb 2017
04 Feb 2017 03:45:16
Well why sign senderos, dodoo, bates, etc if your no gny give them a game. guy is clueless


4.) 04 Feb 2017
04 Feb 2017 04:04:11
I would say that the majority of the support want to see Kiernan and Halliday left out. That is not wholesale changes, it is only two players and two players that have been rank rotten all season.
If we don't have someone that can be deployed in the holding role that would do a better job than Halliday then questions have to be asked as to why we allowed Crooks to go out on loan.

As for Kiernan, Warburton has a choice of three centre backs to deploy instead of him!


5.) 04 Feb 2017
04 Feb 2017 10:02:28
I'm sure I remember Mark Warburton saying earlier in the season that now that we have a supposed "stronger" squad than last season it would mean if players didn't perform then they would be out of the team. Well today is his chance to prove it or maybe it was just so much guff like -the gap (non existent or enormous depending on when he said it or learning from mistakes ie the same ones over and over again) . So over to you then, Mark.


6.) 04 Feb 2017
04 Feb 2017 11:59:01
what if he makes one change and we win?


7.) 04 Feb 2017
04 Feb 2017 16:02:56
How many changes did he actually make today? Just one or was it 2 or 3?


8.) 05 Feb 2017
05 Feb 2017 16:51:18
Two of yesterday's changes, (Halliday and Kiernan), were 100% correct and there was a marked improvement, especially in that second half. The other change was a flop since Garner failed to score despite the number of opportunities that were made. Just look at the corner count alone. A clinical striker would have scored two or three and we would have won at a canter.

I have to say that Windass would also have made a difference coming off the bench but why was he sacrificed for Halliday?