29 Jan 2016 12:07:11
First time posting on here but i do come on and read a lot of comments. But i'm sorry i just had to get a point across to everyone being so negative about this transfer window. Were top of the league by 5 points win tomorrow and in my opinion that rules falkirk out the running with hibs not playing in the league this weekend it allows us to put some pressure on them aswell compared to a year ago were in a great shape. Forrester looks like he might have something just needs match practice and get used to how we play. And for those slagging of the signing of king on loan i bet you all said that about holt or waghorn. Guys who couldn't get a game for previous clubs but are the first two names on the team sheet and arguabaly our two best players. Were signing guys who are coming to our club to prove a point and are hungry to suceed a high level ( not including championship as a high level i'm meaning rangers) and i think king will fall into same bracket. He won this league last year and has played 20 times in the spl this season it gives mckay competion aswell which can only be good for him keeps him on hos toes. So let's stop moaning and be so negative were on the road back and only looking up from here on in.

1.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 12:26:54
Well said mate. Hopefully the boy reed from southampton comes, good player.

2.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 13:42:57
the difference with Waghorn and holt when, complared with king is, waghorn and Holt are our players. Why are we taking King on loan from Hearts? why not give the opportunity for game time to one of our own young players and give them then chance to play and develop.
King would be a decent signing if we were buying him but taking him on loan so he can "continue his development" then return to Hearts is not good for Rangers.
Why not give the chance to Tom Walsh?

3.) 29 Jan 2016
29 Jan 2016 18:21:06
Because king is proven at this level! He is only surplus at hearts because Sam Nicholson has improved dramatically.