Rangers Rumours Member Posts


parky7720's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



parky7720's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To parky7720's Posts



To parky7720's last 5 banter posts


To parky7720's last 5 rumour replies


To parky7720's last 5 banter replies


parky7720 has no Rumours Posts



parky7720's banter posts with other poster's replies to parky7720's banter posts


31 Dec 2016 16:00:01
On something a bit different did anyone else notice Celtic using our goals during the warm up and compmetely blanking the temporary ones at the side? Only moved to them when the groundsmen moved in with pitchforks. that's why Mark Mcghee was raging with their assistant a few weeks back and they are at it again with us. Guess because they are at the top they think they can just do what they like.


1.) 31 Dec 2016 16:58:21
Where are the straws sorry there they are there.

2.) 31 Dec 2016 17:17:45
Its about having some class in the way you act wgw. I have no complaints with the result today.

3.) 31 Dec 2016 22:01:24
Funny u mention Motherwell, who scored the same amount of goals in that one game u mention that yous have managed in 3! And please let's not start lecturing people on class eh, i can't take u serious when yous mention that word lol.



30 Nov 2016 23:54:58
MW manages this team like a 12 year old playing Champ Manager! I'll load one tactic and stick with it every game, all season, no matter the opposition, no matter what happens in the game. Come on, that is absolutely pathetic from a so called professional. He obviously has no tactical knowledge whatsoever then. The only difference I see between him and Ally is that MW has slightly better players than Ally did. He needs to stop trying to fit the players into his tactic and instead find a tactic that fits the players. Also Tavernier needs to be dropped. I said on here weeks ago he was a shocking defender and people came on saying he was one of our best players. Tonight proves me right I think. He is living off his 10 goals last year. Anything he does going forward is not enough to negate his defensive frailtes. At this moment in time I would take a RB who didn't set foot outside his own half over Tavernier in a heartbeat.


1.) 01 Dec 2016 00:34:48
i like that bit instead find a tactic that fits the players but
slightly better players than Ally did but they are not good players
look at them passing the ball they can't pass it to team mate.

2.) 01 Dec 2016 09:53:54
Warbs has good knowledge and a vision for future of the game but it just won't work in scotland he will eventually become a sucess in england where teams are competing on a level in every game! At rangers however every opposing team raises there game and level of physicality which unfortunately warbs just can't come to terms with.



26 Sep 2016 11:57:28
MW has to make changes to his formation and tactics. Our shambolic defending can't go on and we can't continue to give teams a one goal lead. Our 'rampaging' fullbacks have to be reigned in. We simply are not technically good enough to play that way just now. We need a flat back 4 with 2 holding mids in front. Make us hard to score against first and foremost. For me that meand Tav needs to be dropped for Hodson. For everything Tav may offer going forward he negates with his lacklustre and lazy defending. Hodson looks solid and sturdy and deserves a chance to show that he can help shore up a troubled defence. Have 3 attacking mids in front of the defensive 2 with one striker. Might not be attractive football for a time but I'd much rather win ugly than lose with 60% possession doing feck all.


1.) 26 Sep 2016 12:47:24
youve got to be off your nut? Tav been best player this season and has contantly showed to be a rock at the back.

2.) 26 Sep 2016 15:03:26
Tav a rock at the back? Think you've been smoking a rock mate. He can't defend for sh! t. Yes he can be effective going forward but that's not what we need from our defenders just now. He is always out of position because of his attacking play and then he just jogs back down the park. This is putting more pressure on our centre halfs as they don't have the pace to make up the ground when he's not where he should be.

{Ed039's Note - I agree with the point about him not getting back into position quick enough, however when he has been up against it in the right back position I don't think he has disgraced himself and has done well, he was one I was really worried about but he has been one of our better performers)

3.) 26 Sep 2016 15:19:27
Wallace won us the penalty remember I think mckay has only played in bursts this season n needs dropped.

4.) 26 Sep 2016 15:58:48
Yeah Tav was a great rock during that first goal yesterday.

5.) 26 Sep 2016 16:02:45
Tag has been a rock at the back? What games have you been watching he can't defend good going forward at fault for first goal on Sunday he simply can not defend.

6.) 26 Sep 2016 16:18:05
Its funny to think the pelters Sir Walter took for his "cautious approach"now fans are on screaming abt playing flat back 4 with 2 sitting midfielders.

7.) 26 Sep 2016 16:26:03
Tav was up front most of the game against Aberdeen leading to Wilson getting booked because he had to give away a free kick while covering for tav. He has to put his defence duties first we are leaking goals and the majority of games is coming from his side of the field.

8.) 26 Sep 2016 17:10:57
Well Ed that's why I said out fullbacks need to be reigned in. If Tav can consentrate on his defending and being a solid right back first and foremost then fine. But if he continues to aspire to be Cafu then I think at the min Hodson should be given a few games.

9.) 26 Sep 2016 17:11:56
If not a 4-4-2 I like the sound of 4-1-3-2, but anyways I truly believe that we need a left winger Mckay bein right footed has to turn in all the time, he's taken the role on and doing it to the best of his ability but every opposing player knows that he will turn! Don't care if its a loan but we need somebody with a left foot. Warbs should at least either giv Mckay a crack on the right wing and put O'halloran or Forrester out left I thought Warbs may have switched things for say 10 mins during a game. Also the lads need to start havin a go from outside the box and getting them on TARGET! Question Bears was the lad Winks a lefty?

10.) 26 Sep 2016 17:46:33
To be fair Bluedie, Walter had a much more talented squad at his disposal than MW. I'd love for us to play expressive attacking football every week but if we don't have the players for it to work consistantly then changes have to be made at tbe appropriate time and for the appropriate opponant. you can't keep saying 'plan b is doing plan a better'.

11.) 26 Sep 2016 18:02:27
Why did he change the team from the one that beat QotS? Why does he persist with Wallace as captain when he has no leadership qualities, why did he bring in the less than useless Hill or Senderos or Barton?

Why did he not just settle for a quality centre back with leadership qualities and a Striker that knows where the net is. What is the injury that is keeping Rossiter out of the team, why was Crooks not on the bench against Aberdeen, why is Windass consistently injured. We have signed a lot of players that are either not fit for purpose or just not fit!

12.) 27 Sep 2016 03:27:23

because he has no money and trying to attract quality players to Scotland isn't easy.



26 Aug 2016 20:45:31
What were Hill and Kiernan doing for that goal. Both were watching the ball but not bothering to play Boyd offside, yet neither decided to mark him either? If they weren't going for offside then they'd have been better stepping back and keeping Boyd in front of them so they could see him. Yet again Kiernan's positional sense was atrocious.


1.) 26 Aug 2016 20:51:42
Hill is a joke, how can you get done for speed by an overweight Kris Boyd?

2.) 26 Aug 2016 22:02:49
Thought the keeper could have done a bit better too.

3.) 26 Aug 2016 22:09:31
Barton will fill the bench dun nothing but run his mouth aff. holt krancjar crooks mid 3.

4.) 26 Aug 2016 21:55:08
Did help not signing a "defender" in past week / only ourselves to blame?

5.) 26 Aug 2016 22:37:47
Still people defend Kiernan he is truly awful with Hill actually worse. Same predictable rubbish against the worst team in the league and with 10 men.

6.) 26 Aug 2016 22:57:09
Thing is, not signing a defender didn't make a difference. We just can't do it up front just now.

7.) 27 Aug 2016 00:05:50
We're missing holt no doubt about that. The midfield slow play down to a crawl. Not good enough especially as our front 3 are usually pacey.



20 Aug 2016 15:16:09
At the game today and no Puma advertising in the stadium anymore.


1.) 20 Aug 2016 17:24:53
90 minutes plus in every game mate----.




parky7720's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

11 Jan 2017 23:30:45
All 3 have been youth players since 2012. So why are we releasing them? If we offer them a contract on the same terms and another team either offers better or they decided to go elsewhere for regular football then Rangers would be due training compensation money for them. Might only come to 100k but are we in a position to throw that away?




Click To View This Thread

08 Jan 2017 19:51:24
He means Ricky Foster. Jeez oh.




Click To View This Thread

08 Jan 2017 19:45:50
Weeblueguy you are delusional. Every player along with non playing staff was to Tupe over their contracts to the new company. They could then have been sold on to other teams. They would have commanded vastly reduced fees ie 250k rather than the millions they were worth, but any money would have been better than none. Instead they walked away for nothing to negotiate higher contracts with other clubs as no transfer fee was involved. This argument of "they did it for their families" is nonsense. Do you honestly believe that Everton would have been out off Naismith because of a 250k fee? Come on. Bocanegra, Edu, Goian, Bedoya these guys all tuped over to see what the state of play was going to be. The so called Rangers fans jumped ship to line their own pockets and for no other reason.




Click To View This Thread

31 Dec 2016 15:54:13
Exactly LBB. Its not why they did it its the way they all jumped ship and left. let's not forget that McGregor, Naismith, Lafferty etx all claimed to be diehard gers fans. They tucked tails and ran. Edu, Bocanegra, Goian, these guys never clained to be fans of the club before signing but they all tuped over their contracts. Football is different to the likes of our jobs, let's not joke ourselves on that. Clubs would easily have paid 250k for Naismith, McGregor, Whittaker, Lafferty. And that money could have gone to some of the small business creditors who lost out when the company got liquidated. So this 'they did it for their family' argument is nonsense. They did it to line their own pockets and to the detriment of Rangers and Rangers creditors, simple. None of them are welcome in the stadium again never mind on the pitch as far as I'm concerned.




Click To View This Thread

10 Nov 2016 20:12:04
5 in 25 for Sion.1 in 19 for Norwich.2 in 14 for Rizespor and 1 in 6 for Birmingham. I must have a different idea about a good strike rate for a striker. oh aye, and he walked out on us before.





parky7720's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

11 Jan 2017 23:08:15
Punter what I meant was that it was a clueless comment to suggest that our Chairman would take money out of any share issue for his own pocket. I am pro King and Murray and the rest in respect of the people who were in control of our club before. People who did take money out the club by various different methods. I acknowledge that King has made some dubious comments, like front load investing, mentioning £30m and his childrens inheritance. However he and the other investors/ directors have made millions available to the club to try and get us back on an even keel. It annoys me when people only equate transfer kitty as investment in the club (i'm not saying you are one of those people) and say that King etc have not spent any money. Well they have. He may not be the long term answer for our club but he is better than what we have had in the recent past. Sorry for any offence.




Click To View This Thread

11 Jan 2017 20:21:28
ASC-RFC1 Kiernan is good in the air when the ball is coming straight down the middle. If its coming in from the side he is a nightmare. He constanty ball watches and his positional sense is atrocious as is his passing. Wilson on the other hand is good with the ball at his feet. And along with McKay is one of the few we have in the team that can spray a 50-60 yard pass accross the field.




Click To View This Thread

11 Jan 2017 19:40:51
Ok rglen8. In May '15 King through his Company New Oasis Asset Ltd loaned the club £1.5m. In December '15 a further £3m loan facilty was made available to the club by New Oasis of which £2.2 was drawn down. The remaining £0.8 credit remained available to the club. that's an interest free loan of £4.5m that King has made available to the club.
Also on March '15 Douglas Park, John Bennet and Paul Murray made a loan totalling £0.75m between them available. In December '15 they made a further loan of £1.7m between them available to the club. that's £2.45m between the 3 of them.
Also in March '15 George Letham, George Taylor, Andrew Ross, Barry Scott and Scott Murdoch made a loan totalling £1.5m between them available.
In December '15 the same 5 men made a loan totalling £2.375 between them available to the club. that's £3.875m between 5 men.
So 8 men have loaned the club a total of £6.325m between them. King has loaned the club £4.5m himself. So you are right, the 8 'etc' have loaned slightly more than the single King.




Click To View This Thread

11 Jan 2017 18:54:41
Punter if you believe that King could take 20 million out if a share issue then you are clueless. Also, the board have successfully passed resolutions at the last 2 AGMs for a share issue. What they have failed twice at however, is a resolution to have a share issue offered first of all exclusively to new investors. Thus trying to exclude the likes of Ashley and Easdale and so dilute their shareholdings in the company and so their influence when it comes to voting rights.
We know exactly what Ashely would be like as an owner. Look at Newcastle Utd. No investment, but loans that he is owed back to the tune of close to 130m. St. JAMES Park is festooned with Sports Direct advertising that he doesn't pay the going rate for. Look at how he treats his workers at his companies. Rangers is more than Football Players. There are people there on normal wages with everyday mortgages and bills to pay. Do you think they would like this man as their boss? Henis a business man who is out for himself. He is not an idiot so your comment of 'he aligned himself with dead beats' is a rediculous one. He knows exactly what he is doing every step of the way with his dealings with our club and none of it has Rangers best interests at heart.




Click To View This Thread

10 Jan 2017 23:14:28
Recoup it from where exactly Punter? Apart from season ticket sales there is no access to a major revenue stream. No European football means very little sponsorship money, no larger tv or prize money and we have no merchandising money to speak of. let's say Wallace and Garner are on 10K a week (just for talking sake) those 2 players are costing over 1 million accross 52 week contract. Now add up the rest of the first team, development squad, youth teams, coaches, physios, kit men, groundsmen, scouts, dinnerladies, security, travel costs, players accomodation etc. Not to mention running costs of Ibrox and Murray Park and Matchday expenses. So yes I don't like where we are financially compared to Celtic at the min but it grates on me when people say King etc haven't spent any money in the club. There's more to investing in the club and getting it back on its feet than transfer fees.