19 May 2022 18:22:56
This ain’t going to be popular amongst the fans but do we give Jack a new deal? For me am just leaning to no he just can’t stay fit unfortunately he is a great player when fit but that’s few and far between. I think because of the long ball tactics he was missing last night the same with the other two in midfield for long parts of the game tho lundstrum did play ok.


1.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 18:33:39
I'm definitely leaning to yes and let's see jacko get a good summer pre season behind him, before making any rash decisions Even if it came to keeping ryan jack fit for our bigger games i'm certainly all for giving him a new deal because he's a superb midfielder .


2.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 18:35:37
Unfortunately think he should be moved on.


3.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 18:37:13
I think we should wait until after Saturday to discuss this. Last nights match is still so raw with us all. What I do think is Ryan Jack wasn't fit enough to play 75 minutes and probably should've been off around the 60 minute mark along with Wright.


4.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 18:37:30
We don’t need to decide yet. See how many games he plays first six months of next season
No one in rush to sign him
Also he won’t get 13k in Scotland.


5.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 18:37:52
100% keep imo. Valiable member of the squad.


6.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 19:16:51
Jack will be a ger for years.


7.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 19:17:26
Give him to Xmas and if he has usual fitness issues, then unfortunately we need to let him go.


8.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 19:31:59
Our midfield is lost without him, if his time is up we’ll need a very good player in that space. I think McCann or McKinnon may also offer something in that space.


9.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 19:58:33
If we are to move Jack on then we need to know that we can replace him with someone better. Since I doubt that Wilson can do this I would definitely keep him. When fit he is one of our best players.


10.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 20:29:02
Defo keep imo. Fitness issues yes but a good solid player. A 100%er.


11.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 20:38:04
Why not just throw him under the bus .


12.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 21:09:27
Good opinion seeker but but pointless don’t see what killing someone would help.


Are we not allowed to discuss or have opinions on anything on here anymore?


13.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 21:28:48
WILSON AGAIN mate, HAS HE STOLE YOUR LAWNMOWER OR SOMETHING?


14.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 21:59:42
For me we move Jack on we need a player that can play 50/ 60 games a season not just 20/ 30.


15.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 22:12:48
Wouldn't get rid now but don't think I'd give new contract either. Unlike others he's no real sale value and clubs aren't after him. If next season he's fit and playing regularly I'm sure we'd be able to sort contract.


16.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 22:29:06
Berkshire Jack has played 90 miniutes three times in a season.
If he plays day ten x 90 minutes next season why give him a new deal.
We can’t continue to be a charity.


17.) 19 May 2022
19 May 2022 22:59:16
Ryan Jack will be harder to replace than some people think, when he’s not playing he is badly missed.


18.) 20 May 2022
20 May 2022 10:12:04
Jaws tend to agree. However 3 games this season and many subbed or on as a sub so has been replaced plenty
Seeker u seem to be missing the point we r discussing should he get a new deal when contract up in 2023.
Or do u prefer we keep given him 600 k a year not to be available.