24 Dec 2014 13:36:16
The sfa have refused ashley permission to increase his shares to 29% source Scottish news, what does he do now? Step aside & let king invest as this will protect his sports direct deal and ensure his loans are repaid?
r. f

1.) 24 Dec 2014
24 Dec 2014 14:00:55
or maybe just keep propping us up with loans or maybe admin 2 who knows time will tell

2.) 24 Dec 2014
24 Dec 2014 14:10:46
Or the way things are going the club will go ahead and just accept what ever punishment the sfa hand out now that wouldn't surprise me.
r. f

3.) 24 Dec 2014
Just when you didn't think it possible, things look like they're going to get uglier.

This could all have been avoided if the Blue Knights were awarded the rights by Duff & Phelps years ago. That's the answer I'd like more than anything. So many people seem to want our club so badly and yet sold for a paltry 5.5 million quid. Doesn't add up.

4.) 24 Dec 2014
All he will do is have someone else buy shares or have someone given

5.) 24 Dec 2014
Well said kfraser. Better yet, anyone remember the Canadian guy who wanted in at the very start? What was his name? Bill Miller? A guy chased off by abuse from fans after a feeding frenzy to the media, fed no doubt but Green. Appears to me that it's funny how Whyte's bid was picked, how his choice of administrators were picked, how Green got in, how Easdales got in, how Ashley got in. And so it continues. I say, well done SFA for denying Ashley more shares. I don't trust Dave King an inch, don't get me wrong, but there must be someone out there who has clubs best interests at heart and is honest!

6.) 24 Dec 2014
Mo. 89there is one reason it's called fraud.

7.) 25 Dec 2014
Kfraser the reson people were afraid to try buying our club was the threat of the big tax case hanging over us, and the people concerned took that fecking lon g to find in our favour, by that time it was to late, the sfa had allowed a chancer (white)to get his feet under the table, but like the rest of them his day is coming.