12 May 2020 15:25:14
So 13 of the 42 clubs voted in favour which is 30%.
Let that be the end of it and move on. I could see an arument if we had 51% but got no where near it. Democracy must prevail.

1.) 12 May 2020
12 May 2020 15:49:46
I don't think you speak for everyone but you are entitled to your opinion. 👍.

2.) 12 May 2020
12 May 2020 16:07:58
I'm in agreement blue yonder we lost, it wasn't even close time to move on as you said its a democracy a bit fed up with all this crap if people don't agree with us then they must all be corrupt, we used to take the piss out the other mob with their paranoia now we are just as bad.

3.) 12 May 2020
12 May 2020 16:32:58
There is still a case for removing Doncaster under company law and highlighting even more the conflict of interest with McLennans involvement with two tic major shareholders .
Just because the majority don’t want to rock the boat means little . We just go down a different route.

4.) 12 May 2020
12 May 2020 16:47:21
Aye democracy at it’s finest 😂😂 Dundee leveraging its position after votes announced then changing their mind, why? Why did they change it? Democracy! 😂 Clubs money was used to get yes vote, vote yes or no money if it was vote null an void and get your money, guess what, u guessed it they vote for the money. Democracy? This vote dosnt cleanse the spfl of wrong doing or bad governance it didn’t heal Scottish football and let us move on, only an inquiry would. The no clubs voted against transparency, voted against getting everything out in the open and getting the truth and then all of Scottish football could have moved on with all questions answered but it didn’t and we won’t and we shouldn’t because we must demand transparency from our ruling body.