15 Aug 2022 12:43:54
The Times/ RR reporting despite reports, there have been 0 bids for barisic.


1.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 13:54:08
I'd keep him. Played well on Saturday and Yilmaz doesn't look ready yet.


2.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 14:42:14
Tj, they must be right because they always are about our club.


3.) 15 Aug 2022
15 aug 2022 15:13:30
i'll take johns opinion on a barasic offer, we’ll soon find out.


4.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 15:26:52
Usual hearsay, he said, she said, made up headline, made up rumour.

Truth is, no-one really knows unless the club announces something or we see a bit of evidence to support a statement.


5.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 15:29:22
RR, run by a Hibs fan. Do trust such a source.


6.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 15:48:38
Enquires made no official bids.


7.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 16:00:04
Thankfully i have trained my couple of brain cells not to believe anything that the media want me to believe.


8.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 16:51:37
Rfcrb what is your beef with Rangers Review did they sack u.


9.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 19:25:51
I just can't see us selling borna unless we get offered a helluva lot more than the £2million being quoted ?I think and would also hope we keep borna barisic ?.


10.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 19:40:53
The Rangers Review are fan media. They pay £25k/ year for the same exclusive access IbroxRocks or Heart&HAnd get. They are a reliable source of information - It’s coming straight from the club itself. They have access to the training games and such too.


11.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 19:47:13
Rfcrb, I don’t know who runs Rangers Review but I’ve always found their content good and all Rangers orientated. I have never seen anything from them with even a hint of negativity.
Not trying to argue, just surprised at your comments.


12.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 20:04:53
Verdant and gym I agree with both off u, I love their analysis and chat

I’m not least bit bothered one was or is a hibs supporter.


13.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 20:23:08
Rangers Review aren’t fan media. Rangers review are GlasgowTimes.

H&H, FF, 4LADS are.


14.) 15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022 20:48:38
Agree Copland, why do they appear to be so disliked.


15.) 16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022 08:28:19
Not sure they are disliked John.

Problem is that when we believe everything that someone says we become disillusioned when it’s proven that the information was wrong.

One minute we have had offers for Borna, a few days later RR says we haven’t.

IMO if we stop that made up stuff no (as fans) only post/ repeat what we truly believe is a genuine rumour we will be in a better place.

The media loves a non story but surely we can see through most of the made up stuff?


16.) 16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022 09:24:41
BB is very much an important part of our squad and should bot be made available to leave.


17.) 16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022 09:25:12
So are you saying we are not signing Suarez? Man, he'll be gutted. He was really looking forward to trying some Japanese.


18.) 16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022 09:46:15
To get back on topic, it's nonsense to say that Yilmaz isn't ready.


19.) 16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022 10:48:26
DK19,

Rangers Review confirmed there was interest in Sakala from Burnley. However, they apprently spoke to the players agent first, and decided not to pursue that interest. The club were not made an actual offer.

I question if this was ‘tapping up’ but apparently this is common now.


20.) 16 Aug 2022
16 aug 2022 12:48:44
verdant this is common nowadays because it’s virtually impossible for anyone to stop it happen, in fact it’s totally impossible, “tapping “ come in many shapes and sizes, , part and parcel of the game, always been difficult to stop but impossible now.


21.) 16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022 14:25:12
Verdant, not sure if that makes a story or not.

What if?

Rangers have an interest in signing Ronaldo, spoke to his agent and we’re told that he would expect a £25m signing on fee and £5m per week so we didn’t bother to contact Man U?.


22.) 16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022 15:24:28
DK19,

It confirms that clubs are interested in Sakala. It also confirms that they are willing to pay good money. Burnley were willing to pay an alleged £3m for Sakala.

It can be that there’s zero bids, but many clubs have serious interest in the player. They are not mutually exclusive.


23.) 17 Aug 2022
17 Aug 2022 10:53:24
The Media thrives on rumours; best that you don't give too much credibility to them. Personally I give more credence to what John 26 mentions than I would ta any of the Scottish Rags or any Media Outlet!


24.) 17 Aug 2022
17 Aug 2022 11:40:20
That is kind off you Berkshire, there r two or three other very good posters re info, I like Copland 5.